I literally took one hour to finish a 15 pages newspaper, sucking all the words
into my brain from almost all the articles. It has been long since I last feel
genuinely overwhelmed and satisfying reading newspaper article. I learned a lot
on leadership thanks to The Star novel weekly issue – myStarjob – for saving my
time in search for reliable sources on how to be a better leader and also saved
my money for I once thought of attending seminar or workshop to build my soft
skills. Messages in every read were precise, focused and clear unlike some
articles written by the Western which I constantly brain haywire with the
content let alone discrepancy and turmoil. Those articles always made me doubt
on my reading skills.
Well, windows are always opened to all of us as long as we earnest and persevere in searching for it.
Well, windows are always opened to all of us as long as we earnest and persevere in searching for it.
To sum up my fantabulous and bracing read, I would began on
the article entitled Going To War Is So 20th Century.
The title has it all obviously. We are now living in the
fast moving era which time waits for nobody – 21st century – and the
title summed up the read by saying that to achieve something, war – a mean our
ancestors used to apply in achieving something – played no role anymore. The
war, from the writer, defines and includes killing the ruling king or your
competitors. The writer enlightens further as to why the word spells the
following way in the sentence by injecting a point: Why did the same type of
competitors keep bouncing though the present one already been eradicated?
An example is used to illustrate the point. In 2005, MGM, BMG and other entertainment companies sued Grokster, a small company that provide a service on sharing songs, software, etc or in another word, peer-to-peer (P2P) service. Yes, true that Gokster tumbled in the end, but a lot of companies that provide the similar service keep emerging and mushrooming at the same time. As a conclusion to this fail act, eliminating your competitors are not the best way to solve a problem when there is something offered in the market is constant in demand.
An example is used to illustrate the point. In 2005, MGM, BMG and other entertainment companies sued Grokster, a small company that provide a service on sharing songs, software, etc or in another word, peer-to-peer (P2P) service. Yes, true that Gokster tumbled in the end, but a lot of companies that provide the similar service keep emerging and mushrooming at the same time. As a conclusion to this fail act, eliminating your competitors are not the best way to solve a problem when there is something offered in the market is constant in demand.
The emerged winner – Apple – did the right thing.
COLLABORATE. Instead of KILLING the P2P application, Apple adopted the
application and legalise it. How does collaborative seep in here? Apple struck
a deal with the recording labels to allow users to download files at marginal
fees via i-Tunes. It’s like you know what the people/consumers want and if you
destroy it, yet the demand is still there, more companies will emerge to meet
the demand and gain profit from that. So, in such situation, why don’t we look
from the flipped side, take into account on what they want, and build a
collaboration with some other and thus creating a win-win situation.
Another example on collaboration is Wikipedia. You collaborate with others, give them benefits, and let them see as if they benefitted a lot but at the same time, you are actually benefitting more from what they feel they are benefitting. Wikipedia is so famous because it collaborates with anyone who wish to contribute their piece of writing. When the unpaid volunteers feel they are contributing by watching their writing get posted in the internet, they will feel satisfy though no wage is given. This directly raised the name of Wikipedia, for no leaders are needed, but volunteer and also editors.
In the Red Indian tribe, called Apaches, has leader – Nant’an – who died, a new one emerged, not by appointment by because they wanted to, not because they had to.
This phrase is superiorly vital and it applies on this example. Southwest Airlines and Air Asia have successfully engaged their customers to collaborate with them to lower their costs through downloading and printing their own airline ticket. You see, human will start to do something when they want to. They want to reduce their cost and so they will want to print their ticket.
Another example on collaboration is Wikipedia. You collaborate with others, give them benefits, and let them see as if they benefitted a lot but at the same time, you are actually benefitting more from what they feel they are benefitting. Wikipedia is so famous because it collaborates with anyone who wish to contribute their piece of writing. When the unpaid volunteers feel they are contributing by watching their writing get posted in the internet, they will feel satisfy though no wage is given. This directly raised the name of Wikipedia, for no leaders are needed, but volunteer and also editors.
In the Red Indian tribe, called Apaches, has leader – Nant’an – who died, a new one emerged, not by appointment by because they wanted to, not because they had to.
This phrase is superiorly vital and it applies on this example. Southwest Airlines and Air Asia have successfully engaged their customers to collaborate with them to lower their costs through downloading and printing their own airline ticket. You see, human will start to do something when they want to. They want to reduce their cost and so they will want to print their ticket.
Last example would be the GoldCorp in Canda. Rob McEwen, a
chairman and CEO took a bold step by revealing his propriety (rules of correct
behaviour) mining data to the entire world and called for those who can help
him study the data and find out where the next six million ounces of gold were.
Reward will be given of course. The aftermath was a positive one when Nick
Archibald, used 3D software to identify the key areas to mine. Well, collaboration
and win-win situation. Although there is a risk on revealing something private
from your company to the world, when a person has an urge or want to contribute
with of course reward, you should not refrain. This is because you will gain
back more when you give a little. GoldCorp catapulted from under-performing US$
100 000 million to US$ 9 billion!
As a conclusion, collaborate, is what we should imply in 21st century.
As a conclusion, collaborate, is what we should imply in 21st century.
As for my second summary, I pick The Arrogance of Growth.
Rajeey Peshawaria written in dismay but at the same time, hoping to rekindle and evoke consciousness. The issue is about us, Asian, who constantly accusing the West for not trying to understand others’ perspective and wanting to rule the world with their own my-way-on-the-highway mentality. But in reality, the converse is the truth. Her own experience, she wrote. She was invited to give a talk on global best practices in creating a winning corporate culture to the Group Leadership Team (GLT) by the HR and CEO after reading her new book. But 15 minutes later, she was told to shorten her talk to 15 minutes only. Later on, they informed her that they would have to cancel a slot but however rebound to 15 minutes presentation after the plea by the HR and CEO to the management.
The problem was, the leaders were not interested at all in
her speech – introducing some other kind of culture in leading for they think
theirs’ are the best. You see, arrogance played. Such situation did happen and
this is a great reminder to me so as not to be like them.
Gandhi always portrays and urges the world to go for leadership with humility. Yes, leadership with humility, is when you take into account of what your subordinates see and tell you.
LEADING WITH HUMBLE CONFIDENCE – three simple steps.
#1 : Ask three simple question before you give your opinion in a meeting.
Gandhi always portrays and urges the world to go for leadership with humility. Yes, leadership with humility, is when you take into account of what your subordinates see and tell you.
LEADING WITH HUMBLE CONFIDENCE – three simple steps.
#1 : Ask three simple question before you give your opinion in a meeting.
#2 : Help others, try as much to reach out to people
although in surface they might seem of no use to you. Who knows, in future
these are the people who can help you.
#3 : Share your expertise and vast knowledge at the same
time, learn something from everyone you meet. Do not be veiled by their
weakness only.
And, an additional from me based on Prof. Dr. Rohana Jani,
my college’s master – “Afterall what you get does not belong to you at any
means, so why not giving to others. “
My last summary and the one that I perceive as VIL – very
important lesson – as I constantly face this problem and to be able to know
how, would be the golden lesson among all.
Work-life balance, something I always seek, for I do not wish to live life with remorse or slap to consciousness only after a life-risking accident strikes me.
Work-life balance, something I always seek, for I do not wish to live life with remorse or slap to consciousness only after a life-risking accident strikes me.
Work-life balance is not a static pendulum and the point is
making the pendulum not stuck in the extreme only but allowing for moments of
balance. So, how am I going to reach this?
ALL DILEMMAS OFFER A CHOICE. Unless held at gunpoint, we should not feel victimised or as if taken “hostage” by works, study, family and friends. We have and can make a choice. Next time when I face contradicting demands, I would make a conscious choice :
ALL DILEMMAS OFFER A CHOICE. Unless held at gunpoint, we should not feel victimised or as if taken “hostage” by works, study, family and friends. We have and can make a choice. Next time when I face contradicting demands, I would make a conscious choice :
1)
Am I going to please the boss, the family,
friends or myself?
2) What do I want?
3) What is my priority?
4)
Every choice will mean paying some kind of
price. We may want it all, but can we accept not having it all without regret
or guilt?
5) Where do your feelings of achievement, joy,
contentment come from?
Do remember that when you feel guilty for the choice you
made, you will be unable to open for negotiation. Feeling guilty on the choice
you made also will ruin the whole experience for choice you had made. It will
use up your whole energy to fully engage with what you are doing.
REMEMBER : CREATING LIFE BALANCE IS ALL ABOUT REACHING
EXTERNAL AGREEMENT AND INTERNAL
ACCEPTANCE.
For organisational leaders who face ever-increasing change,
demands and uncertainties about the future, CREATING A POSITIVE STATE-OF-MIND
is critical competence. Ask yourself
these few questions to check whether you have found some kind of balance
between life at work and life at home :
1) Am I
enjoying life?
2) Am I on
the path I want to be both professionally and personally?
3) Do I have
enough time for my family, my work, my studies, and myself?
4) How do I
recover my energy?
5) Do I feel
in control or do I feel like a hostage?
To sum up,
do realise the consequences for the future of the choices made or not made in
the present.
: )
WOW
Fantastic Baby.
That’s all from myself today. 1782 words. :)







